How to deepen the analysis
Reflective writing only needs a brief description or summary, followed by a more sustained analysis. This analysis often comes out of looking at your description or summary, and then asking ‘how?’ and ‘why?’
In the example of reflective writing below, the student has provided just a description:
Read the following example of reflective writing. The example comes from an assignment that required the student to reflect on learning theory. To help you write reflections that move beyond description, answer the questions that follow.

Activity
Read the following two extracts from a student assignment in which they were asked to reflect on themselves as a learner.
After you have read through the two examples, answer the questions below.
Example A
The first formal stage of cognitive development in Constructivist theory is considered to be preoperational (between 2 and 7 years), in which children are able to represent their world with symbols, that is, numbers, language, gestures, shapes, pictures, and colour (Piaget, 1964). Although behaviour and thinking at this stage may seem illogical to an adult perspective (Snowman, 2009), make-believe play is seen as an important aspect or hallmark of preoperational cognitivism (Hedges, 2000). Indeed I can distinctly remember many occasions where I enjoyed taking on the role of airplane captain or dinosaur, for example, during play as a young child. Elsewhere I enjoyed building with Lego even though my early designs may not have seemed logical from an adult perspective. Therefore, reflecting on my preoperational cognitive development I believe experiences from play shaped my learning, consistent with Constructivist theory.
Example B
The first formal stage of cognitive development in Constructivist theory is considered to be preoperational (between 2 and 7 years), in which children are able to represent their world with symbols, that is, numbers, language, gestures, shapes, pictures, and colour (Piaget, 1964). Although behaviour and thinking at this stage may seem illogical to an adult perspective (Snowman, 2009), make-believe play is seen as an important aspect or hallmark of preoperational cognitivism (Hedges, 2000). Indeed I can distinctly remember many occasions where I enjoyed taking on the role of airplane captain or dinosaur, for example, during play as a young child. During these moments, I enjoyed acting out, or performing, what I knew about professional responsibilities and prehistoric times. I also tested my understanding of these things through interactions with others, welcoming feedback from others. For instance, my mother told me that the largest dinosaurs, such as the Brachiosaurus, were actually herbivores, so I pretended to only eat plants. Therefore, reflecting on my preoperational cognitive development I believe experiences from play shaped my learning, consistent with Constructivist theory. It is important to remember in the classroom environment, therefore, that learning is not simply the act of acquiring knowledge, but is the process of interacting with, enquiring about and ultimately understanding the world in which we live.

Activity
The following questions, derived from Gibbs’ Reflective Cycle (as explained in the introductory video), help you analyse this experience. These are the types of questions you can ask when writing your own analyses: